2019年03月26日

Future Issues of Indefinite Employment Reclassification Rule - Learning from the Precedent in South Korea -

生活研究部 主任研究員・ヘルスケアリサーチセンター・ジェロントロジー推進室兼任   金 明中

雇用統計│日本 人手不足・働き方改革 などの記事に関心のあるあなたへ

btn-mag-b.png
基礎研 Report Head Lineではそんなあなたにおすすめのメルマガ配信中!
各種レポート配信をメールでお知らせするので読み逃しを防ぎます!

ご登録はこちら

twitter Facebook このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加 Pocketで後で読む

文字サイズ

■Summary
 
  • In both Japan as well as South Korea, the increase in non-regular workers can be observed as a long-term trend.
     
  • In 2007, as the increase in non-regular workers accelerated, the South Korean government implemented the “Act on the Protection of Non-Regular Workers.”
     
  • Ten years have already elapsed since South Korea introduced its Act on the Protection of Non-Regular Workers. Since this new system has been implemented, socio-economic changes and the impact of the system have somewhat reduced the ratio of non-regular workers in the workplace, but non-regular workers still account for over 30% of all jobs. Further, the malignant practice of hiring cutoff remains as it is.
     
  • Even those who have been reclassified as indefinite-term contractual workers due to the implementation of the Act on the Protection of Non-Regular Workers have seen no improvement in their working conditions, and many are faced with an increasingly wide gap in wages and benefits when compared with regular employees.
     
  • Japanese Government applied its own “indefinite employment reclassification rule” from April 2018.
     
  • Even though Section 20 of Japan’s Labor Contracts Act prohibits discrimination against fixed-term contract workers as compared with indefinite-term contract workers, it does not address discrimination against indefinite-term contract workers as compared against regular employees.
     
  • Even if hiring cutoff is not as severe as it was in South Korea, it is feared that neglecting to take measures to improve working conditions for indefinite-term contract workers will create new disparities between indefinite-term contract workers and regular employees.
     
  • We continue to monitor what measures the Japanese and South Korean governments will take to improve working conditions for non-regular workers and indefinite-term contract workers.


■Index

1――Introduction
2――Definition of non-regular employee in Japan and South Korea
  (1) Definition of non-regular employee in Japan
  (2) Definition of non-regular employee in South Korea
3――Background of Act on Protection of Non-regular
 employee’s enforcement and changes after that
  (1) South Korean government enforced Act on Protection of Non-regular
    employee
  (2) Changes after enforcement of Act on Protection of Non-regular employee
  (3) Primary Results of Labor Mobility Panel Surveys by Mode of Employment
    (1 – 8)
4――The Start of an “Indefinite Employment Reclassification Rule” in Japan
5――Conclusions
twitter Facebook このエントリーをはてなブックマークに追加 Pocketで後で読む
32_ext_01_0.jpg

生活研究部   主任研究員・ヘルスケアリサーチセンター・ジェロントロジー推進室兼任

金 明中 (きむ みょんじゅん)

研究・専門分野
社会保障論、労働経済学、日・韓社会政策比較分析、韓国経済

アクセスランキング

レポート紹介

【Future Issues of Indefinite Employment Reclassification Rule - Learning from the Precedent in South Korea -】【シンクタンク】ニッセイ基礎研究所は、保険・年金・社会保障、経済・金融・不動産、暮らし・高齢社会、経営・ビジネスなどの各専門領域の研究員を抱え、様々な情報提供を行っています。

Future Issues of Indefinite Employment Reclassification Rule - Learning from the Precedent in South Korea -のレポート Topへ