- シンクタンクならニッセイ基礎研究所 >
- 金融・為替 >
- 金融政策 >
- Reflections on Financial Regulators’ Initial Responses to COVID-19
2022年07月01日
Reflections on Financial Regulators’ Initial Responses to COVID-19
文字サイズ
- 小
- 中
- 大
■Summary
More than two years have passed since the outbreak of COVID-19. The world may have to live with the pandemic and its legacies for further years, but the two years may already allow us to look back on the initial emergency responses and attempt to tentatively assess them.
At the time of the outbreak and until September 2021, the author chaired the Standing Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Cooperation (SRC) of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), which globally coordinated financial sector policy responses to the pandemic. Below are my recollections of financial regulators’ concerns, how they designed the responses, and the role that financial sector policy played as part of the overall economic policy responses. I focus on global responses but also refer to Japanese initiatives.
The first section describes the four main concerns regulators had at the onset. The second section reviews the responses to address concerns over operational risks. The third section discusses responses to market and liquidity risks. The fourth section is about responses to secure continued financing while addressing solvency risks, and the fifth section reviews the modality of international coordination. The sixth section concludes.
Each jurisdiction faced different challenges. The unprecedented shock resulted in diversity in views even within a jurisdiction. I highlight a common denominator but will inevitably be biased by my personal views. The narrative will not necessarily represent the view of the FSB or its member institutions or the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA) at the time.
■Index
1――Four concerns
2――Responses to address operational risk concerns
3――Responses to address market and liquidity risks
4――Responses to prevent a credit crunch and to address solvency risks
5――International coordination
6――In retrospect
More than two years have passed since the outbreak of COVID-19. The world may have to live with the pandemic and its legacies for further years, but the two years may already allow us to look back on the initial emergency responses and attempt to tentatively assess them.
At the time of the outbreak and until September 2021, the author chaired the Standing Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Cooperation (SRC) of the Financial Stability Board (FSB), which globally coordinated financial sector policy responses to the pandemic. Below are my recollections of financial regulators’ concerns, how they designed the responses, and the role that financial sector policy played as part of the overall economic policy responses. I focus on global responses but also refer to Japanese initiatives.
The first section describes the four main concerns regulators had at the onset. The second section reviews the responses to address concerns over operational risks. The third section discusses responses to market and liquidity risks. The fourth section is about responses to secure continued financing while addressing solvency risks, and the fifth section reviews the modality of international coordination. The sixth section concludes.
Each jurisdiction faced different challenges. The unprecedented shock resulted in diversity in views even within a jurisdiction. I highlight a common denominator but will inevitably be biased by my personal views. The narrative will not necessarily represent the view of the FSB or its member institutions or the Japanese Financial Services Agency (JFSA) at the time.
■Index
1――Four concerns
2――Responses to address operational risk concerns
3――Responses to address market and liquidity risks
4――Responses to prevent a credit crunch and to address solvency risks
5――International coordination
6――In retrospect
(2022年07月01日「基礎研レポート」)
氷見野 良三
氷見野 良三のレポート
| 日付 | タイトル | 執筆者 | 媒体 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022/12/07 | データからナラティブへ-非財務情報の開示のあり方を巡って | 氷見野 良三 | 基礎研マンスリー |
| 2022/10/14 | データからナラティブへ-非財務情報の開示のあり方を巡って | 氷見野 良三 | 基礎研レポート |
| 2022/08/05 | ロシアのウクライナ侵略は「グローバル化の終わり」を告げるのか | 氷見野 良三 | 基礎研マンスリー |
| 2022/07/01 | Reflections on Financial Regulators’ Initial Responses to COVID-19 | 氷見野 良三 | 基礎研レポート |
新着記事
-
2026年01月20日
トランプ2.0始動から1年-米欧関係の現在地と日本への示唆 -
2026年01月20日
国内外の社会変化は、サステナ行動にどう表れたのか-「できそう」という感覚が分けた、20代のサステナ行動の差(1) -
2026年01月20日
保険金受取人と税金-個人保険契約における取扱い -
2026年01月20日
今週のレポート・コラムまとめ【1/13-1/19発行分】 -
2026年01月19日
中国の不動産関連統計(25年12月)~不動産開発投資が一段と悪化
お知らせ
-
2025年12月16日
News Release
令和7年度 住宅ストック維持・向上促進事業「良質住宅ストック形成のための市場環境整備促進事業」に関するシンポジウムの開催
-
2025年12月01日
News Release
-
2025年12月01日
News Release
【Reflections on Financial Regulators’ Initial Responses to COVID-19】【シンクタンク】ニッセイ基礎研究所は、保険・年金・社会保障、経済・金融・不動産、暮らし・高齢社会、経営・ビジネスなどの各専門領域の研究員を抱え、様々な情報提供を行っています。
Reflections on Financial Regulators’ Initial Responses to COVID-19のレポート Topへ









